“After careful consideration of all documents and statements provided by the club, the CFCB Investigatory Chamber considers that the circumstances of the case do not allow for the conclusion of a settlement agreement. In particular, the CFCB Investigatory Chamber considers that there are, among other things, uncertainties regarding the refinancing of the loan to be repaid in October 2018 and the bonds. The Adjudicatory Chamber shall decide in due course. UEFA is only prepared to grant the voluntary agreement if there are three situations: a project based on reasonable grounds, business continuity and the irrevocable commitment of the largest shareholder to financially support the association throughout the period. It does not include fines or penalties unless the agreement is respected. Now let`s move on to the settlement agreement. Man made me angry in today`s issue of Il Corriere dello Sport, it is made clear what the difference is between the volunteering agreement and the conciliation agreement (which Milan should comply with). The first is a request to be made before December 31 and only by clubs that did not qualify for the European Cups or by those who changed ownership last year. This type of agreement has a maximum duration of four years and is based on a series of stable commitments on long-term trade parameters. Many have asked why Paris Saint-Germain or Manchester City could spend so much more on the transfer market while making deal deals, but Milan are in an unusual situation. MILAN, 22 years old. May (Reuters) – UEFA will reject a request by Italian football club AC Milan to strike a settlement agreement over a breach of financial fair play rules, a source with knowledge of the matter said on Tuesday.