Agency Agreement Case Law

The simplest prevention is to carefully design a written contract and be adapted to business needs and try to protect against high potential risks. If it is too late and an agency has been set up, it is essential to provide early legal advice before termination, otherwise the agent can benefit from high compensation and can assert an infringement. The common law agency regulates the provision of services or agreements, for example.B between employers and workers, as well as goods. The Common Law Agency is much broader and can serve as an umbrella term and can be applied to goods and services as well as to employer-worker relations. It may not be clear which law applies and it may be useful to provide early legal advice. The following article provides an overview of the Common Law Agency and the reflections and aspects that most often go wrong. If a person acting on behalf of another person has no purported or actual authority to do so, or if he or she cannot change the legal relationship of another party without obtaining explicit authority at every opportunity, he or she is probably not an “agent” in the law. Even if a person`s professional title is an agent, their actions do not necessarily have to be binding on the person they purport to represent. If this is the case, the agent himself could be held liable in the event of a dispute. An initial figure long covered by general contract law, by case law alone, the assignment of a contract is now governed by Articles 1216 to 1216-3 of the Civil Code, as it emerges from the ordinance of 10 February 2016 which makes it a solemn treaty (Civil Code, Art. 1216, (…) The termination of the agency contract ends. Neither party may require enforcement. The party who terminates the mediation contract without respecting its duration or without respecting the legal or agreed notice (and without the agreement of the other party) is liable for damages, unless the denunciation takes place for an urgent reason that is immediately notified to the other party.

There are three types of financial or commercial risks essential to the definition of a commercial agent contract for the purposes of Article 101(1). First, there are contract-specific risks that are directly related to contracts concluded and/or negotiated by the agent on behalf of the contracting entity, such as. Β the financing of stocks. Second, there are the risks associated with market-specific investments. These are investments which are specially necessary for the nature of the activity for which the agent has been appointed by the contracting authority, i.e. which are necessary to enable the agent to conclude and/or negotiate such a contract. These investments are usually sunk, which means that the investment cannot be used or sold for other activities after leaving that particular sector, except with a significant loss. Thirdly, there are risks associated with other activities carried out on the same product market, in so far as the contracting entity requires the agent to carry out such activities, not as an agent on behalf of the contracting entity, but at his own risk.

. . .