Lyft Arbitration Agreement

As a driver on the Lyft platform, you recognize and believe that you and Lyft are in a direct business relationship and that the relationship between the parties under this agreement is exclusively in accordance with the independent parties. You and Lyft expressly agree that this is not an employment contract and does not establish a working relationship between you and Lyft; and (2) by this agreement, no joint venture, franchisor, partnership or agency relationship is planned or created. You are not allowed to ling Lyft and you agree not to assert yourself as a Lyft employee, agent or agent. Any arbitration procedure implemented under this arbitration agreement is managed by the American Arbitration Association (AAA), in accordance with its consumerist arbitration rules, in effect at the time of the opening of the arbitration, as amended by the terms set out in this agreement. Copies of these rules are available on the AAA ( website (the “AAA Rules”) or by phone from the AAA at 1-800-778-7879. Regardless of the above, if they are requested by you and if appropriate on the basis of the facts and circumstances of the claims made, the arbitrator has the power to choose another sentence of the AAA rules, but under no circumstances can the arbitrator consolidate more than a person`s claims or, otherwise, preside over any form of representative procedure. , collective or class. The parties may choose another arbitration administrator by mutual written consent. U.S. District Judge Edward Chen of San Francisco last month heard arguments about Uber`s disqualification claim. It also monitors Uber drivers` petition to force Uber to pay their original arbitration fees and lyfts lawsuit against Keller Lenkner. It is likely that Judge Chens Docket will soon contain the new petition asking Lyft to also pay the conciliation fees for the drivers.

The payment of registration and arbitration fees will be governed by the corresponding AAA rules subject to the following changes: Uber, which has been an accuser with the U.S. Board in the Seattle Driver Protection Litigation, Postman said it had access to years of its basic lawyer`s work product, through “hundreds of emails” , regularly scheduled conference calls and personal meetings, during which Uber and the Board carried out their attack on Seattle law. (The application was not filed in a case involving lawsuits against Uber, but in a footnote to “Thousands of individual arbitrations against Uber on behalf of drivers”). Assuming that this problem is resolved and that Keller continues with the representation, it is doubtful (and perhaps almost physically impossible) that the result will be 15,000 individual arbitration proceedings. If two arbitrations were held every day of the year, it would still take more than 20 years for 15,000 cases to be resolved; This could be a good system of full employment for lawyers, but there are obvious drawbacks for both drivers and businesses. The deal could be the next step – in fact, Uber would have tentatively agreed to settle another arbitration panel submitted by O`Connor v. Uber Lawyer Shannon Liss-Riorden for 11 cents per mile traveled. Just receive a notification of lyft s updates that said that if I wanted to keep rolling, I had to accept the new conditions. After reading, I find that the most important change in the terms and conditions is that it says that we can no longer participate in a class action, and if we have problems with lyft there, we have to do it with them or above a lawyer to bring a lawsuit. Is there anything I`m worried about? Similarly, the date of the updated conditions indicates “last update: February 6, 2018.” Why do I hear about it now? As a driver or driver applicant, you may opt for the driver claims settlement requirement set out in Section 17 (e) (3) (except in the provision limited by Section 17 (i) above, in accordance with the provisions of this subsection), if you have not previously accepted an arbitration decision under the Terms of Use of L